Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 46.4 2-Core 92.5 41% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 185 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 19 15% 18.7 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 17.5 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 347 387 417 425 422 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 317 Write 112 Mixed 357 SusWrite 392 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 24.8 91% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 177 150% 216 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 100%
Intenso Ultra Line 124GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 89GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 56 38 63 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 147 Write 118 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 56.4 117% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.9 248% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 13.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	3x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	2x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $119

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16