Today's hottest deals

Asrock AM1B-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock AM1B-M  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 16:04
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3850 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 49
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 39.9
25% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 77.6
8-Core 78.2
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 78
5% 78 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
ASRock(1849 9836) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.2
1% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 73 74 40 49 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 357
Write 251
Mixed 242
SusWrite 79.7
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 16.4
32% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 28.8
35% 65 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BA160B.C16F 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1B-M Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $22
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback