Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[7379AC1]-

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[7379AC1]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 69Y4356
Memory	36 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '20 at 12:28
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5672 426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 180 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 552 53% 437 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 841F) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 43.3 27% 35.4 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 31.8 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 510GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1,559 Write 1,770 Mixed 1,665 373% 1,665 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 45.2 164% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 201 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 187%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 616GB free Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 312 313 312 313 313 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,665 Write 1996 Mixed 1,852 SusWrite 317 328% 1,457 MB/s	4K Read 64.2 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 57.4 202% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 225 172% 232 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 159%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 393GB free Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 19.2 Mixed 37 SusWrite 19.1 105% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 178%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 48GB 2,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 19.5 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback