PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110926 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 23 '20 at 15:35 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | IRN-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 39 38 42 49 53 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 750GB
81GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
9.88%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 110x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 83x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |