HP EliteBook 8460p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8460p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 16:14
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 64
2-Core 101
51% 80 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 142
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 161C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.8
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120G 120GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 53 83 74 66 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 253
Write 110
Mixed 139
SusWrite 72.7
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 15.6
55% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 70
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 80.5
64% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
8GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 65 60 70 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 50.3
Write 55.7
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 65.7
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim WH 2TB
3GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 24.7
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 16.5
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 68%
ADATA HV100 1TB
45GB free, PID a42a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.6 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.5
Write 50.6
SusWrite 0.8
40% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 44%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MBB 500GB
17GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 30 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 30.7
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 32
42% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 44%
Generic External 500GB
47GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 22.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 14.5
28% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.7% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.8
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8460p Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8460p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback