MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 71.1
36% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 187
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 37
Parallax 73.4
45% 55.1 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 42.6
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,174
Write 1,936
Mixed 722
356% 1,611 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 42.7
157% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 384
286% 378 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
72GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 133 132 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 481
Write 462
Mixed 331
SusWrite 154
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 41.6
144% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 171
176% 286 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 108%
WD WD3200BJKT-00F4T0 320GB
6GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 36.8
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 40.7
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 47%
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB
14GB free
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 40
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 33.6
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 35%
WD WD1200JD-00HBC0 120GB
15GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 36
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 41.9
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 18.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $904
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback