Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 22:59
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 910
90% 734 Pts
64-Core 2,104
130% 2,104 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 68.2
57% 70.8 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 384 433 458 466 442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 452
Mixed 402
SusWrite 412
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 41.4
153% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 196
176% 262 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
90GB free
Firmware: X6105101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 102 117 111 98 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 323
Write 228
Mixed 244
SusWrite 118
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 29.1
103% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 95
98% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 97%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 173 177 177 179 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 195
Write 176
Mixed 125
SusWrite 177
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 38%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$76
182GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 142 146 150 150 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 147
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 88%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFAX-68J 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 21 42 30 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 17
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 28.8
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 25.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $690
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback