Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 16:26
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 918
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,809
112% 1,809 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 62.4
52% 64.5 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 60.9
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$37
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 337 328 293 285 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1551
Write 484
Mixed 459
SusWrite 310
153% 701 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 39.5
150% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 268
289% 488 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 153%
Great: 216%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
519GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 111 112 109 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 111
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 0.9
19% 6.57 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 38%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
253GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 89 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 107
Write 85
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 89
19% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1
10% 4.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.8
3% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 38%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
408GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 38 68 67 56 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 78.7
Write 101
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 58.8
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
147% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 88%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB
439GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 39.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 40.2
52% 40 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 16
1,153% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 20.7
1,679% 21.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.7% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 24.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $738
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback