Emachines eME732

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Emachines eME732 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines HM55_CP
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110411
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 28 '17 at 09:16
Run Duration	2000 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 94.7 47% 73.9 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 159 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0498) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.84 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z220 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 26 100 26 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 322 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 38 (A9) Unknown 100 100 22 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 31 (AE) Unknown 100 100 45 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 100 201863462951 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2813 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1557 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1969	32.3% Below average	Read 239 Write 200 Mixed 221 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 3.29 35% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 22 DQ Mixed 3.22 7% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 78%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1TB free, PID 202a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 19.1 Mixed 16.9 25% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.22 54% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 33%
Brother DCP-J515N 4GB 4GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.28% Terrible	Read 0.69 Write 0.48 Mixed 0.57 1% 0.58 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 2% 0.06 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KSN-4G 2x4GB 593 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 8.1 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 4.6 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical eME732 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Emachines eME732

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	3x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	1x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	5x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	2x
16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 2x4GBUnknownBench 32%, 380 samples	1x
M471B5674QH0-YK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 36%, 723 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Emachines eME732

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Emachines eME732

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)