Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Memory 38 1-Core 9.6 2-Core 33 19% 26.9 Pts	4-Core 43 8-Core 49.1 6% 46 Pts	64-Core 41.5 3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0417) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SamsungSSD860EVO250GB 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25C SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 156 131 157 125 174 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 170 Write 172 Mixed 176 SusWrite 154 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 7.4 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 84.9 DQ Mixed 14.6 35% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 059B CT51264BF1339.M16F 6GB 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	5x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SamsungSSD860EVO250GB 256GBBench 62%, 8 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	2x
JM1333KSN-2G 1x2GBTranscendBench 19%, 51 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $93

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16