Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 22:44
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 652
60% 503 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 205
Parallax 192
147% 193 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
129% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 133%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 276 104 98 78 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 278
Write 301
Mixed 249
SusWrite 150
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 37.2
122% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 248
193% 265 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 134%
Toshiba MK4058GSX 400GB
29GB free
Firmware: FF011C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 46 49 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 46
Write 48.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 46.5
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
87GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 68.3
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 71
48% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39%
Great: 68%
OCZ-AGILITY3 240GB
180GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 14 13 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 15
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 20.6
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,104
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback