Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171106
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$123 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 238 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 488 56% 439 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2067) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.8% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 92.1 Parallax 103 85% 99.8 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 98 Splatting 85.2 82% 102 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 123 122 114 115 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 488 Mixed 390 SusWrite 155 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 52.3 190% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 152 122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$250 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 477 473 489 489 488 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 458 Mixed 388 SusWrite 481 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 52.9 180% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 352 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 122%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 278GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2288 793 799 796 795 797 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	312% Outstanding	Read 2,623 Write 2,394 Mixed 1,540 SusWrite 1,045 425% 1,901 MB/s	4K Read 69.6 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 93.3 304% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,208 DQ Write 973 DQ Mixed 1,021 783% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 312% Great: 346%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 413GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 126 127 127 128 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 154 Write 144 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 126 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 666 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.2 2.8 4 3.6 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.01% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 1.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.3 6% 5.97 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.01% Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer 128GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 119GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.6 5.9 3 4.5 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.3 8% 7.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 24% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 11.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $160Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	283x
Core i5-8400Intel $115Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	238x
Core i5-8600KIntel $123Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	92x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	85x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	31x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $118Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $416

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406