Asus M32CD

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '21 at 08:12
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 107 47% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 287 29% 235 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8664) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 59.4 50% 62 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 60 Splatting 52.2 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$74 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 228 223 222 225 222 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 440 Write 386 Mixed 354 SusWrite 245 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 32.5 107% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 260 195% 259 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 166GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 125 125 128 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 124 Write 114 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 125 70% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 390GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 87 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 77.3 Write 80.8 Mixed 46 SusWrite 88.6 99% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 61%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3.5TB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 135 142 141 145 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 170 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 141 194% 149 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 0.9 447% 9.63 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 1 421% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 92%
SABRENT 512GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 89GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 135 142 143 144 143 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 282 Write 265 Mixed 260 SusWrite 142 314% 237 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 23.7 1,786% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 35.3 DQ Mixed 30.4 2,333% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 267%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1MNG/8G 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	187x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	86x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	9x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	51x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	64x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	22x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 63 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16