HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory1.9 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 172
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 380
45% 348 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Sapphire(174B E193) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5.7
0% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 67 51 61 88 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 70
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.6 4.2 4.8 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 21
Write 12.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.2
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback