MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory37 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 09:57
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 299
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 991
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 1449
90% 1449 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 41.5
36% 43.4 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 29.6
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 815 853 787 265 263 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,633
Write 1,010
Mixed 1,152
SusWrite 541
293% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 86.5
295% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 482
475% 751 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 269%
Great: 277%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
44GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 369 370 374 372 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 366
Write 366
Mixed 292
SusWrite 358
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 40.3
145% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 216
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 119%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109
801GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 450 452 455 453 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 436
Mixed 421
SusWrite 436
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 52.3
173% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 165 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 170
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 164
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 108%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 142 141 145 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C16/16G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C16/16G 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384, 4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $922
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback