Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 15:11
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 195
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 631
60% 497 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 5161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 65.8
55% 69.2 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 66.6
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 17 19 8.4 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
711GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 152 152 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 159
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 152
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 SP008GBLFU240B02 SP008GBLFU240B02 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 16.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback