| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 8.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 18 '21 at 16:15 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
25.7%
Poor
|
28% 47.2 Pts
|
16% 129 Pts
|
12% 190 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 250
PwrHis(1787 2334) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12.1
|
8.64%
Terrible
|
9% 12.7 fps
|
8% 10.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 59 28 51 59 52 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
29% 39.6 MB/s
|
58% 0.5 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40
63GB free
Firmware: ZM100-38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 10 11 13 17 24 MB/s
|
6.01%
Terrible
|
13% 17.5 MB/s
|
30% 0.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
|
19%
Very poor
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
12% 4.03 GB/s
|
17% 231 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 40x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 7x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 4x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $237 |