Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 147% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 (all builds)
Memory	18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '21 at 02:48
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 70.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 299 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 1,182 103% 879 Pts	64-Core 2,788 173% 2,788 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Gigabyte(1458 3FE9) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 173 Parallax 175 139% 173 fps	MRender 196 Gravity 154 Splatting 127 127% 159 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$300 4,259 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1149 2069 1356 1303 1272 1299 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 1,833 Write 2,151 Mixed 1,656 SusWrite 1,408 397% 1,762 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 58.2 207% 79.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,236 DQ Write 804 DQ Mixed 1,003 753% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 320%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 405GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 431 431 436 437 435 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 421 Mixed 411 SusWrite 433 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 52 169% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 204 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 2TB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 431 432 436 437 435 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 434 Mixed 416 SusWrite 433 100% 442 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 51.1 168% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 131%
Samsung 970 PRO 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 876GB free Firmware: 8205 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.9% Very poor	Read 39.4 Write 37.4 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 36.5 9% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 13.7 46% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 17.7 13% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 87%
Toshiba MG06ACA10TE 10TB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 7.5TB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 227 222 228 227 229 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 201 Mixed 97.1 SusWrite 220 131% 180 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 137%
WD WD101VRYZ-02MVAB1 10TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 6.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 181 Write 43.3 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 44.6 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 117%
Toshiba MG07ACA12TE 12TB 231 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 11TB free Firmware: 4304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 238 228 227 232 233 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 140 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 230 113% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.3% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 26.8 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 25 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 180%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 179%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	61x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	51x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	42x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	25x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	25x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	24x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $149Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	22x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16