Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161122
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '21 at 07:52
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 166 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 356 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 187 Parallax 121 94% 141 fps	MRender 89 Gravity 117 Splatting 104 85% 103 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 278 278 277 279 277 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 432 Mixed 403 SusWrite 278 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 48.9 164% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 358 267% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 387GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 140 142 141 142 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 152 Write 180 Mixed 38 SusWrite 140 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 54GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 114 Write 41 Mixed 58.5 78% 71 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2 154% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FD 2x8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.3% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 21.3 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 18.8 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	268x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	171x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	138x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	139x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x

SSD
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	37x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	28x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $415

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16