Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory4.1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 03:08
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6700-$192
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 48.8
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 26.7
24% 32 Pts
4-Core 49
8-Core 14.5
5% 31.8 Pts
64-Core 51.4
3% 51.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 70 31 40 74 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 23.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 52.6
22% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Expansion 3TB
371GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 57 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 108
Write 99.6
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 62.4
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 1TB
417GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 22 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 29.6
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 23.6
36% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.32% Terrible
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 1.5
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback