PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120711 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 24 '21 at 08:28 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X2 255
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 70 69 69 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB
234GB free
Firmware: VA111630
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 70 70 69 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
103GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 44 45 45 46 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-004.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 48x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 42x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $265 |