Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 12:03
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$128
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 972
100% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,165
72% 1,165 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.8% Very good
Lighting 98
Reflection 111
Parallax 99.2
80% 103 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 99.4
80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2283 618 620 622 628 628 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 2,396
Mixed 1,683
SusWrite 900
421% 1,883 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 93.3
313% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1,226
924% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 310%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 170 179 181 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 148
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 178
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
334GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 116 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 98.6
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 116
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 75%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB
432GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 40.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 37.6
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 27
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.4
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback