Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 17:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 403
52% 395 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 64.9
0% 34.5 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 26.6
30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 29 26 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 68
Mixed 46
SusWrite 29
42% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 52%
Gb0250ea FYK 250GB
63GB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 108 107 108 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 109
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 GR1600D364L11S/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback