Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Q1900M  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '19 at 19:39
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 45.6
31% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 89.5
12% 88.8 Pts
64-Core 87.8
5% 87.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
MSI(1462 275B) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 8.19
6% 7.38 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 8.93
Splatting 9.48
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 129 63 104 58 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 240
Write 222
Mixed 202
SusWrite 99
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 22
82% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 145
120% 171 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 GR1600D364L11S/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback