Asrock N68-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '17 at 19:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 80.6
41% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 80.4
8-Core 80.2
11% 80.3 Pts
64-Core 78.9
5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 160
Mixed 148
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.34
141% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 109%
Maxtor S TM3160211AS 160GB
40GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 67.9
Write 68
Mixed 68.3
51% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.41
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback