Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 06:47
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$125
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 815
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 33.5
21% 29 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 19.9
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 500GB 500GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S6OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 415 420 421 421 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 422
Mixed 293
SusWrite 419
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 39.5
136% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 213
193% 293 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
466GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 124 125 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 126
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
149GB free
Firmware: 3.ADJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 66.5
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 69.3
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00 79GB
73GB free
Firmware: MB4OC60R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 31
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 29.9
22% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Samsung HM320JI 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 2SS00_01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 62.1
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 64.6
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 36%
WD My Passport 1TB
422GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 86.5
Write 90.4
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 92.3
108% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 24.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback