Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 57.9 2-Core 113 42% 73 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 225 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1E39 A007) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 3.7 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3 256GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 82 68 75 62 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 424 Write 363 Mixed 315 SusWrite 88 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 5 61% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 35.2 DQ Mixed 19.7 47% 105 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 40,829 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.5% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	5x

SSD
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3 256GBBench 66%, 104 samples	4x
WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TBWDCBench 96%, 39,874 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	2x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 49%, 5,960 samples	1x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16