User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GBT___ NVDAACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte M61SME-S2
Memory	1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070306
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '17 at 11:55
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 784 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 55.3 34% 48.6 Pts	4-Core 54.6 8-Core 54.9 7% 54.8 Pts	64-Core 54.8 3% 54.8 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3482) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.57% Terrible	Lighting 5.73 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 1.91 5% 5.38 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 4.03 Splatting 5.39 4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.57% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: FH10 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 63 Write 69 Mixed 69.6 51% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.23 71% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 56%
Maxtor 6 E040L0 40GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 14GB free Firmware: NAR6 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 55.6 Mixed 47.9 40% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%
Samsung SP0411N 40GB-$30 485 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 9GB free Firmware: TW100-11 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 80 (03) Spinup time 62 61 6464 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1723 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1388385 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 925 (C2) HDA temperature 142 97 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 117567182 (C4) Reallocation count 96 96 10 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 96 96 10 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 4	20.6% Poor	Read 35.1 Write 36.6 Mixed 22.1 23% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)