HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory	16.1 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 08:41
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 153 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 455 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 809 50% 809 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 10.6 7% 9.7 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 9.7 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 677GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 61 61 63 63 58 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.7% Poor	Read 136 Write 57.1 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 59.1 16% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 13.6 49% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 59.3 DQ Mixed 75.2 62% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 128%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68 11,781 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 406GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 13 13 12 9.5 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.47% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 9.3 Mixed 7 SusWrite 12.4 7% 9.73 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 6.47% Great: 104%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 5 5.3 5 4.7 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.17% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 8.9 Mixed 8 SusWrite 4.6 12% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.17% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 58GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 18.8 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	98x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16