Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 204 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 469 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 510 32% 510 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W7000 1,338 User benchmarks, average bench 22% HP(103C 030C) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 34.5 Parallax 40.9 22% 34 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 30 Splatting 23.6 22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MMDOE56G5MXP-MVB 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM19C1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 109 125 149 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 20% Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 11GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 9.6 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Read 6.7 Write 28.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 13.7 20% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965432-068.A00LF 4x4GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 33.5 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.8 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	500x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	264x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	58x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373