Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 16:00
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 89 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 139 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 360 35% 289 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 112 Parallax 93.6 82% 102 fps	MRender 97.1 Gravity 94.5 Splatting 95.3 78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD 3+0 Stripe/RAID0 6TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4.5TB free Firmware: 1.10 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 1,006 Write 418 Mixed 390 132% 605 MB/s	4K Read 7.82 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 0.85 21% 7.97 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 1.14 5% 11 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 72%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9637798 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -38336878078941 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1800 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 419 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 46 55837589539 (C2) HDA temperature 35 46 55837589539 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9637798 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9637798 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9637798 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10053 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10292 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10292 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12975	33.7% Below average	Read 158 Write 90.5 Mixed 103 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 10.5 63% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 68 DQ Write 90 DQ Mixed 27.3 35% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 135 135 8618377632 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 48 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 101 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 48 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 193275166760 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 168 Mixed 166 130% 173 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.18 79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 106 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.17 75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 19.2 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	566x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359