Today's hottest deals

HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP xw8400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory29.3 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '17 at 15:40
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5365
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 69.1
37% 56 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 275
24% 206 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 111
Parallax 106
90% 109 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 100
81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS500G32TND-N1A2A 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 3000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 255
Write 176
Mixed 182
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 12
72% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 11.6
39% 86 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 137
Write 89.9
Mixed 86.9
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 7.72
4K Write 5.15
4K Mixed 0.44
466% 4.44 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 87%
Volume0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 138
Mixed 119
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.19
81% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 125%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 127
Write 133
Mixed 113
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 2.89
4K Mixed 0.28
133% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 112%
WDC WD20 01FASS-00W2B0 2TB
897GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 23.9
Mixed 19.5
30% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.39
82% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback