Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Aspire TC-865 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-865
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180516
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '21 at 16:29
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 452 60% 449 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1238) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6195 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 7.2 6% 7 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 2% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 821GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 64 104 113 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 176 Write 147 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 96.1 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 107%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 4TB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 16 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 37.7 Mixed 34 SusWrite 15.3 23% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 94%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.98% Terrible	Read 34.2 Write 24.4 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 0.2 16% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 102%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 3TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 25.7 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 0.2 17% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 78%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 2TB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 16 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 37.5 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 15.4 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 87%
HITACHI HUA723030ALA640 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 3TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.36% Terrible	Read 33.4 Write 7 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 2.1 14% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 8%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 33.2 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 2.2 30% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB 30,532 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.5% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 24.5 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 22.7 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	143x
Core i5-9400Intel $155Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	61x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	38x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	121x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	32x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	8x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	8x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	39x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 43%, 7,364 samples	13x
AO2P26KC8T1-BPYS 1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 1,471 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $194

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359