Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 19:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 108
48% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 206
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 55.3
34% 45.4 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 42
40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 129 49 62 57 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 213
Write 218
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 73
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 6.8
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 91.6
77% 115 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
185GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 68 68 69 70 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 83.2
Write 84.8
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 67.1
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V -63 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: AX0A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 112 112 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 110
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD KP223C-ELD Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $488
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback