Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200731
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 82 1-Core 152 2-Core 304 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 964 94% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,428 88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.4% Very good	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 112 Parallax 97.2 81% 103 fps	MRender 90.8 Gravity 93 Splatting 96.3 77% 93.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 453GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2393 2074 2105 2229 2128 1999 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	387% Outstanding	Read 2,712 Write 2,517 Mixed 1,549 SusWrite 2,154 501% 2,233 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 195 4K Mixed 84.4 297% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,314 DQ Write 1,190 DQ Mixed 1,240 933% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 387% Great: 425%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 97GB free Firmware: RVT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9,293 Write 6,548 Mixed 7,415 1,721% 7,752 MB/s	4K Read 593 4K Write 508 4K Mixed 85.2 1,276% 395 MB/s	DQ Read 623 DQ Write 1,165 DQ Mixed 1,177 814% 988 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
3 1T B SSD 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 79GB free Firmware: S123 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 56 67 6.5 3.2 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 515 Write 333 Mixed 10 SusWrite 46.9 49% 226 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 90%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 158 163 164 159 163 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 2,984 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.8% Outstanding	MC Read 37 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 36.8 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 37.2 83% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 144%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	162x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	142x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	95x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	45x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,183

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16