Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 76.3 2-Core 153 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 292 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 036C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 4.8 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 4 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 101 66 59 57 35 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 211 Write 203 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 75.8 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 14.5 64% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 68.6 DQ Mixed 35.5 31% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	129x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	56x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	33x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
99U5471-002.A01LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 45%, 627 samples	13x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	13x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $201

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16