Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Memory 28.3 1-Core 19.5 2-Core 21 16% 22.9 Pts	4-Core 24 8-Core 38.8 4% 31.4 Pts	64-Core 20.8 1% 20.8 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 62 60 57 54 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 351 Write 264 Mixed 250 SusWrite 62.9 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 21.9 82% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 88.3 DQ Mixed 97.5 73% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 86%
Intenso Rainbow 16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 10GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.4 8.4 9.4 9.2 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 4 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 8.6 10% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB 5,684 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 265 15% 265 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	2,326x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	942x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	387x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	116x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	53x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	375x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	182x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16