Today's hottest deals

Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200306
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 17:40
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 150
52% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 512
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 9.9
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 8
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2144
Write 1,957
Mixed 1447
411% 1,849 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 65.2
219% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 548
396% 518 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
70GB free
Firmware: DXT4200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 126 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 373
Write 122
Mixed 142
SusWrite 126
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 21.1
101% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 55.3
85% 167 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
560GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 93.6
Write 29.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 29.8
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
73GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 101
Write 36.9
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 36.7
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 17.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback