HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 372
51% 377 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512M8VC 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 315 355 355 298 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 410
Write 202
Mixed 255
SusWrite 315
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 24.6
85% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 92.9
100% 175 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MJ68F9F1600 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $141
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback