Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '17 at 15:09
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 51.5 1-Core 53.3 2-Core 82.7 39% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 77.8 8-Core 84.8 11% 81.3 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 33.7 28% 31.1 fps	MRender 52.8 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 31.6 31% 39 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mzd.live mSCSI MiniPorts 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 739GB free Firmware: 0002 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 47.7 Write 74 Mixed 72.7 15% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 16.7 49% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 41 DQ Mixed 16.3 19% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 31%
Mzd.live mSCSI MiniPorts 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 57GB free Firmware: 0004 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 50.7 Write 55.5 Mixed 44.8 11% 50.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.29 4K Write 8.61 4K Mixed 9.85 30% 8.92 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 45.5 DQ Mixed 22.2 21% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 29%
Mzd.live mSCSI MiniPorts 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 32GB free Firmware: 0003 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 40 Write 57 Mixed 39.5 10% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.62 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 17.4 43% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.7 DQ Write 61.5 DQ Mixed 33.1 30% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 29%
Mzd.live mSCSI MiniPorts 31GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 55.5 Write 94.8 Mixed 67.2 16% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 15.8 49% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.4 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 29.4 27% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 75.C93DE.G040 1x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.8% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	49x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	26x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	32x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	8x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16