Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111202
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 02 '17 at 19:07
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 115
52% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 291
33% 256 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 59.2
46% 61.3 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 57.7
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ VX500 512GB-$208
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYCX0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 485
Write 369
Mixed 482
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 15.1
66% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 43
36% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
765GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 137
Mixed 133
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
37GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.2
Write 78.7
Mixed 64.5
56% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.34
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
28GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 6.11
Mixed 7.84
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.11
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 1.17
92% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 14%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 25.5
17% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback