Today's hottest deals

HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 00:15
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 783
70% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,995
123% 1,995 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
521GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 443 430 382 385 387 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 428
Mixed 391
SusWrite 409
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 46.9
152% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Seagate BarraCud 1TB
314GB free
Firmware: D013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 446 447 445 446 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 434
Mixed 416
SusWrite 445
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 45.6
147% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 258
195% 263 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Seagate SSD 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: 1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 345 219 442 413 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 434
Mixed 365
SusWrite 383
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 36.1
123% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 194
162% 236 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate BarraCud 960GB
464GB free
Firmware: H012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 434 433 432 434 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 255
Write 110
Mixed 212
SusWrite 433
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 31.1
108% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 171
136% 187 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST320005 2TB
761GB free
Firmware: NA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.2% Good
Read 108
Write 96.3
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 101
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
587GB free
Firmware: A5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 118
Write 123
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 101
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
257GB free
Firmware: A580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 87 89 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 76.5
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 88.9
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270CH0-YH9 M393B5270CH0-YH9 M393B5270CH0-YH9 Hynix HMT351R7BFR4A-H9 M393B5270CH0-YH9 M393B5270CH0-YH9 M393B5270CH0-YH9 Hynix HMT351R7AFR4A-H9 M393B52... 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback