ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30AGS10606

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30AGS10606 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 581 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 392.59 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 20 17% 19.4 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 23 Splatting 15.9 16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK512MBF 512GB 918 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 165 137 133 128 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 409 Write 187 Mixed 153 SusWrite 142 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 36.5 135% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 51.9 75% 136 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 104%
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB 3,843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 0GB free Firmware: JULA1102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 495 Write 452 Mixed 446 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 41 132% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 111 129% 225 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 55GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 86 86 86 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 82.7 Write 83 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 84.9 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 69%
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 6200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 11.5 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 9.7 17% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.7 158% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 10%
Alliance AF 1GB 0GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2 2 2 1.9 2.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.1% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 1.5 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 2 5% 5.52 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.93 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB 3,888 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback