Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 139
60% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 435
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Gigabyte(1458 226B) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 10.3
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 7
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 109 119 117 122 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 407
Write 368
Mixed 251
SusWrite 131
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 36.2
122% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 144
137% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 108%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
119GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 150
Write 125
Mixed 80
SusWrite 85.9
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
225GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 168 168 167 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 159
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 166
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB
300GB free
Firmware: JKAOA31H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 68
Write 74.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 110
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$144
49GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 85.7
Write 83.2
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 45
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 55%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
867GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 114
147% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 71%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
312GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 67 67 68 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 118
Write 107
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 66.9
102% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 50%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
266GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0.2 0 0.1 1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 31.9
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 0.3
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 32%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
321GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 31 33 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.5% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 30.9
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 31.9
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
65GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.2 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 36.1
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 0.4
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 47%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
204GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4 4.2 4.2 3.9 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 31.4
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 5.2
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
169% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback