Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20210403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5470
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 62
2-Core 123
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 244
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B E990) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 1.5
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dysk wirtualny firmy Microsoft 86GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 61 61 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
Read 250
Write 167
Mixed 154
SusWrite 60.8
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 72.5
65% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 44%
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
39GB free
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 251
Write 166
Mixed 160
SusWrite 60.4
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 22.6
81% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 74.6
68% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 51%
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 2TB
703GB free
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 33 18 14 18 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 288
Write 121
Mixed 72
SusWrite 17.9
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 1.2
7% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 2.1
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 4.3
4% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 61%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 298 308 316 307 318 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 337
Write 331
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 304
182% 253 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 1.2
315% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 184%
Great: 292%
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 2TB
747GB free
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 122 147 151 145 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 136%
SiImage 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 55 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 96
Write 72
Mixed 47
SusWrite 54.5
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1
253% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 82%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
386GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 37 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 70
Mixed 39
SusWrite 35.2
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback