Asus P5K SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5K SE  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '17 at 21:58
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3320
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 85.4
45% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 164
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Palit(1569 0FC1) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 8.94
7% 8.36 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.98 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 232
Write 196
Mixed 148
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 3.1
64% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 5.13
16% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback