Today's hottest deals

HP p6774y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP p6774y  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 02:02
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 45
2-Core 88.9
47% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 167
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.92 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 61
Write 64.2
Mixed 63.4
47% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.39
109% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6774y Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6774y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $274WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback