Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 59.6 41% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 60.3 8-Core 58.1 8% 59.2 Pts	64-Core 59 4% 59 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT 5,568 User benchmarks, average bench 6% XFX(1682 2330) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 1.8 6% 6.67 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 3.5 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 14 14 13 13 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 52.5 Write 34.5 Mixed 36 SusWrite 15.5 26% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 54%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-32ZTB0 500GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 156GB free, PID b159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 25.2 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 22.7 33% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	7x
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	3x
SSD370S 128GBTranscend $70Bench 74%, 10,510 samples	2x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $300