LG B50PQ.AS36B1E

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	LG B50PQ.AS36B1E (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR MS-7717
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 04 '21 at 09:48
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 132 57% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 289 37% 281 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 42.4 Parallax 39.1 31% 39.9 fps	MRender 40.5 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 28.6 29% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Viva300s Pro LITE 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 28 27 20 22 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 390 Write 266 Mixed 36 SusWrite 43.6 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 14.4 55% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 4.2 19% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 82%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 396GB free Firmware: GM4OA52A SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 72 74 76 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 65.5 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 74.1 43% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 51%
SV-CURIOSITY 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 686GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.9% Very poor	Read 20.3 Write 22.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 18.8 28% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 28%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 142GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 32 Write 20.3 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 17.3 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.2 247% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.6% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 96.5 42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16