Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 15:43
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 444
60% 447 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 68.2
64% 74.8 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 70
Splatting 69.7
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 500
Write 308
Mixed 382
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 12.1
70% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 52.5
40% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 89.3
Write 75.3
Mixed 85.7
63% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.21
68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 83
Mixed 85.4
65% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.37
84% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
WD Re 1.5TB
175GB free
Firmware: 01.01D01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 84.7
Write 75.7
Mixed 75
59% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.51
153% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
149GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 89.3
Write 137
Mixed 100
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.55
127% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LE Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback